We have been attempting to highlight to
democratic deficit here in Norfolk for some time now as decisions made by
elected bodies at county and district ignore popular opinion and press ahead
with schemes that do not have the backing of the local electorate.
The Kings Lynn Incinerator is a classic
example and the comments made below by Messrs Bellingham and Freeman, two local
Norfolk MP’s in a Parliamentary debate on 16th Jan 2013, highlight
the deficit admirably.
HENRY BELLIGHAM
(North West Norfolk,
Conservative)
What do the public think of all this? During the
consultation process I chaired some public meetings, and both sides of the
argument were made vehemently and strongly. Nearly 2,000 people voted, having
attended those meetings, and 99% voted against the incinerator. The borough council then carried out a
borough-wide referendum covering my entire constituency and most of the
constituency of my hon. Friend Elizabeth Truss.
It was run by King’s Lynn and West Norfolk borough council under
Electoral Commission rules, and the result was remarkable—65,516 people voted
no on a turnout of 61.3%, so a total of 92.68% voted no. Compared with the recent police and crime
commissioner elections, when the turnout was around 12%, that must be one of
the most decisive, if not the most decisive result in British electoral
history.
GEORGE FREEMAN (Mid Norfolk, Conservative)
Does he agree that whatever
the whys and wherefores of the issue—some of the arguments are complex—localism
often requires difficult and tough decisions from the locality, but democracy
is ill served if, at any level of government, consultation takes place but its
findings are ignored, particularly when they are as overwhelming as in this
case?
You can see the full text of
the Parliamentary debate here:
http://www.theyworkforyou.com/whall/?id=2013-01-16a.312.1&s=Norwich#g318.0
http://www.theyworkforyou.com/whall/?id=2013-01-16a.312.1&s=Norwich#g318.0
We couldn’t have put it more succinctly.
Now roll in the following decisions made
against public opinion and, in the case of the first, against legal advice:
- Joint Core Strategy
- Northern Distributor Road
- Purchase of RAF Coltishall
- Great Yarmouth Outer Harbour
Our contention then is that in their drive
to convert from revenue spending organisations into revenue generating
organisations local councils have forgotten about the wishes of the very people
they are elected to serve. There is
however a great opportunity to upset the current seat of power at County Hall
by standing as an Independent in May.
Let us know if you would support an Independent!
hi.yes i would welcome a chance to vote for an HONEST independant candidate hopefully with common sense.
ReplyDeleteI would definitely vote Independent, get some non Party influence on the Council.
ReplyDeleteA return to democracy would be very welcome and would help to restore "faith in the system". A politically independant candidate with the right popularly supported ideas would certainly get my vote.
ReplyDeleteJust look at 'WHAT' has been in charge of Norfolk County!! 'MURPHY'....I rest my case.
ReplyDeleteIt's not local goverment that are slashing budgets, its central goverment. Local goverment is responding by creating revenue streams that will help to preserve vital services. Highlighting the attitude to 'localism' in Broadland DC is commedable but denouncing local goverment as a whole for developing income streams to maintaing public services loses you credibility.
ReplyDeleteThe former leader of NCC and chairman of the conservatives has now been found guilty of misconduct. Now we need the same kind of investigation into the leadership of BDC.
ReplyDelete